Red Hat has been the most successful Linux provider to date, with more than
2.5 million subscriptions sold by the end of 2008. It intends to build on this
success with a continuing focus on the price performance of Linux.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Executive summary
The Ovum view
SWOT analysis
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Linux automation
Deployment: certify once, deploy anywhere
Management: less developed but as important
Expanded support
A seven-year support lifecycle
To ten years
Extended update support
Building on Fedora' s shoulders
A good relationship is key
Server strategy
Nothing new apart from packaging
RHEL AP package
Boosting revenues by getting customers to move from RHEL standard to AP
Partly successful
Less vocal on storage than it used to be
RHEL MRG package
On top of RHEL standard or AP
Realtime kernel for predictability
Grid to leverage spare compute capacity
Messaging for high throughput computing
A challenging mix to market
The Red Hat HPC Solution package
HTC versus HPC
Red Hat HPC Solution: turnkey HPC with third-party technology
RHEL for HPC Compute Nodes for DIY enthusiasts (and service providers)
Desktop strategy
More focus towards virtualisation as well as Windows
Renewed interest
From ' playing to the gallery' (2007) to the Qumranet acquisition (2008)
RHEL Desktop
Red Hat Global Desktop (RHGD)
Thin clients
Virtualised clients
Entering the nascent, fiercely contested virtual desktop market
Solid Ice/Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager technology
User experience, desktop density and price as key differentiators